Trafy
Research

Unit-Independent Low-Rate Wrist GSR Processing for Stress Detection Using Phasic nSCR Features

Galvanic skin response (GSR) is widely used for stress detection, but wrist-based GSR remains challenging because its absolute amplitude can differ substanti...

Zequan Liang·Jul 9, 2026·2 min read·Original source ↗
Unit-Independent Low-Rate Wrist GSR Processing for Stress Detection Using Phasic nSCR Features

Unit-Independent Low-Rate Wrist GSR Processing for Stress Detection Using Phasic nSCR Features2607.08007AuthorsZequan Liang,Sally Hang,Ning Miao,Mahdi Pirayesh Shirazi Nejad,Hossein Sayadiand 6 moreAbstractGalvanic skin response (GSR) is widely used for stress detection, but wrist-based GSR remains challenging because its absolute amplitude can differ substantially from laboratory-grade palmar measurements. In this paper, we propose a unit-independent low-rate wrist GSR processing pipeline to extract the number of skin conductance responses per minute (nSCR/min) as a stress-related feature. We collect paired wrist and palmar GSR recordings from 31 participants during sitting baseline, standing baseline, neutral speaking, and the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), a laboratory social stressor task. The proposed pipeline cleans the raw GSR signal, decomposes it into tonic skin conductance level (SCL) and phasic skin conductance response (SCR), applies robust z-score normalization, and detects phasic SCR peaks to compute nSCR/min. Using random forest on 25Hz We-Be GSR, nSCR/min achieved balanced accuracies of 0.823 and 0.871 for binary classification between TSST and the sitting and standing baselines, respectively. Moreover, the 25Hz We-Be GSR features achieved comparable balanced accuracy to the original 100Hz features across the evaluated tasks. These results suggest the feasibility of low-rate, unit-independent wrist GSR processing for wearable stress detection.ResourcesView on Hugging FaceRead PDFArXiv

Related

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, training models to resist such signals, hides a failure mode: a model that ignores all context looks robust yet is useless when the context is worth trusting. We recast the problem as selective trust and introduce MIST, a human-annotated benchmark that renders each reasoning item under four matched conditions (clean, misleading, correct-context, and irrelevant-context), together with SC2W, a paired metric counting how often a misle

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min
Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, tr...

Papers with Code · Aug 6, 2026
1 min
Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature EngineeringResearch

Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature Engineering

Electronic health record (EHR) feature engineering is a major bottleneck in clinical research and AI, accounting for 39-45% of data scientists' workload. This is especially pronounced in heart failure, which affects an estimated 6.7 million U.S. adults and requires integrating fragmented EHR data with disease-specific, guideline-based clinical reasoning. Existing rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based approaches offer only partial automation with limited maintainability and evidence traceability. We developed the Nimblemind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), an evidence-linked, rubr

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min