Trafy
Research

Q-Steer: Action-Value Guidance for Molecular Policy Optimization

Oracle-limited molecular optimization gives reward only after a complete molecule is generated, while each rollout requires many local next-token decisions. ...

Xinyu Wang·Jul 29, 2026·2 min read·Original source ↗
Q-Steer: Action-Value Guidance for Molecular Policy Optimization

Q-Steer: Action-Value Guidance for Molecular Policy Optimization2607.26391AuthorsXinyu Wang,Jinbo Bi,Minghu SongAbstractOracle-limited molecular optimization gives reward only after a complete molecule is generated, while each rollout requires many local next-token decisions. This delayed-feedback interface makes molecular policy optimization myopic: an optimizer can learn that a molecule was good without knowing which intermediate actions made it good. We introduce Q-Steer, a rollout-time action-value steering primitive for molecular language models. Q-Steer uses an offline-trained and frozen prefix-action value scorer, PAVS-Q, that estimates the downstream reward of taking a candidate next token under a partial SMILES prefix, then adds a normalized value bonus to sampling logits. The optimizer update rule and online oracle budget are unchanged; the claim is fixed-online-oracle performance, not equal total compute. On PMO23 with a fixed 10,000-call online budget, complete factorial studies across two molecular language-model backbones and four optimizers show that Q-Steer improves mean valid-unique score in all eight backbone-optimizer cells, with positive macro mean-score gains between +0.033 and +0.049 and 18-20 task wins per cell. Mechanism controls show that action identity matters: prefix-broadcast values are nearly neutral, while shuffled action values harm performance. These results support Q-Steer as a reusable rollout-time action-value wrapper that improves average molecular optimization reward across optimizer families and policy backbones without changing the online oracle budget.ResourcesView on Hugging FaceRead PDFArXiv

Related

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, training models to resist such signals, hides a failure mode: a model that ignores all context looks robust yet is useless when the context is worth trusting. We recast the problem as selective trust and introduce MIST, a human-annotated benchmark that renders each reasoning item under four matched conditions (clean, misleading, correct-context, and irrelevant-context), together with SC2W, a paired metric counting how often a misle

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min
Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, tr...

Papers with Code · Aug 6, 2026
1 min
Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature EngineeringResearch

Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature Engineering

Electronic health record (EHR) feature engineering is a major bottleneck in clinical research and AI, accounting for 39-45% of data scientists' workload. This is especially pronounced in heart failure, which affects an estimated 6.7 million U.S. adults and requires integrating fragmented EHR data with disease-specific, guideline-based clinical reasoning. Existing rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based approaches offer only partial automation with limited maintainability and evidence traceability. We developed the Nimblemind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), an evidence-linked, rubr

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min