Trafy
Research

Global Attention-Fused Image Cropping with Attention-Guided and Global-Aligned Crop Evaluator

Image cropping aims to improve image aesthetics by preserving important content within an appropriately composed region. However, most existing methods focus...

Kin-Man Lam·Aug 5, 2026·2 min read·Original source ↗
Global Attention-Fused Image Cropping with Attention-Guided and Global-Aligned Crop Evaluator

Global Attention-Fused Image Cropping with Attention-Guided and Global-Aligned Crop Evaluator2608.04821AuthorsKin-Man Lam,Patrick Le Callet,Xin Sun,Haotian Yang,Zhile YangAbstractImage cropping aims to improve image aesthetics by preserving important content within an appropriately composed region. However, most existing methods focus primarily on salient regions and therefore have limited sensitivity to the global relationships among the main image components. To address this limitation, we propose Global Attention-Fused Image Cropping (GAFIC), which consists of an Attention-Guided Feature Fusion (AGFF) and a Global-Aligned Crop Evaluator (GACE). AGFF aggregates the importance of local regions to construct a global representation that captures both image structure and local details. GACE aligns candidate crop features with this global representation, enabling crop evaluation to remain sensitive to boundary changes. We further combine three ranking losses across multiple scales to obtain accurate and stable crop scores. Extensive experiments on the GAIC and CPC datasets demonstrate that GAFIC outperforms existing image-cropping methods, particularly in terms of accuracy and stability. Unlike pixel-level retargeting methods such as seam carving, inpainting, and diffusion-based synthesis, GAFIC does not synthesize or modify the retained pixels; instead, it selects an aesthetically preferred crop from the source image, making it suitable for scenarios where pixel integrity and efficient batch processing are important. The source code is available at https://github.com/AIVRC/GAFIC.git.ResourcesView on Hugging FaceRead PDFArXiv

Related

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, training models to resist such signals, hides a failure mode: a model that ignores all context looks robust yet is useless when the context is worth trusting. We recast the problem as selective trust and introduce MIST, a human-annotated benchmark that renders each reasoning item under four matched conditions (clean, misleading, correct-context, and irrelevant-context), together with SC2W, a paired metric counting how often a misle

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min
Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference OptimizationResearch

Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization

Language models increasingly condition their answers on external signals, and a single misleading one can turn a correct answer wrong. The obvious remedy, tr...

Papers with Code · Aug 6, 2026
1 min
Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature EngineeringResearch

Tracing the Heart: An Evidence-Linked Pipeline for Heart-Failure Feature Engineering

Electronic health record (EHR) feature engineering is a major bottleneck in clinical research and AI, accounting for 39-45% of data scientists' workload. This is especially pronounced in heart failure, which affects an estimated 6.7 million U.S. adults and requires integrating fragmented EHR data with disease-specific, guideline-based clinical reasoning. Existing rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based approaches offer only partial automation with limited maintainability and evidence traceability. We developed the Nimblemind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), an evidence-linked, rubr

arXiv (cs.AI) · Aug 6, 2026
4 min